HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Casler, M. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Casler, M. D. Agricola Articles by Casler, M. D. Related Collections Other Forage Crops Crop Genetics

Among-and-within-Family Selection in Eight Forage Grass Populations

USDA-ARS, U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI 53706-1108. Research supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1197

^* Corresponding author (mdcasler{at}wisc.edu).

Forage yields increased little during the twentieth century, despite intensive breeding efforts in many species. Half-sib family (HSF) and/or among-and-within-family (AWF) selection methods may overcome this problem. The objective of this study was to compare HSF and AWF selection using forage yield of sward plots as the among-family selection criterion and natural selection of survivors within swards as the within-family selection criterion. Selection for increased forage yield was practiced in eight populations of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.), and hybrid wheatgrass [Elytrigia x muctonata (Opiz ex Bercht.) Prokud.]. Two methods of recombination were used: random plants from remnant seed (HSF) or sod cores from selected families four years after establishment (AWF). There were no consistent differences between HSF and AWF selection for orchardgrass, a bunch grass. For the other two species, both highly rhizomatous, AWF selection was two to four times more effective than HSF selection for increasing forage yield. Natural selection within families of the two rhizomatous grasses favored genotypes capable of filling in open spaces left by plant and/or tiller mortality. The consistent differences in selection responses between orchardgrass and the two rhizomatous species suggested that natural selection acted on some characteristic of the rhizomatous trait of these two grasses.

Abbreviations: AWF, among-and-within-family • HSF, half-sib family • HSPT, half-sib progeny-test • NNA, nearest neighbor analysis • PLS, pure live seed • SIR, sets-in-replicate

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.

Received for publication May 11, 2007.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. D. Casler and E. C. Brummer Theoretical Expected Genetic Gains for Among-and-Within-Family Selection Methods in Perennial Forage Crops Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 890 - 902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]