HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Toole, J. C. Articles by Gomez, K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by O'Toole, J. C. Articles by Gomez, K. A. Agricola Articles by O'Toole, J. C. Articles by Gomez, K. A.

Comparison of Some Crop Water Stress Measurement Methods¹

The measurement of crop water stress under field conditions is fraught with technical and logistical problems. Although leaf water potential has become a standard measurement it has spatial and temporal sampling limitations. In the current study, a rice (Oryza sativa L.) crop was used to compare eight measurements indicating crop water status, namely leaf water potential _leaf), stomatal resistance (r_a, transpiration rate (T), net photosynthesis rate (P_N), canopy temperature (T_c), canopy minus air temperature (T_c — T_a), crop water stress index (CWSI), and visual leaf rolling score (LRS). The eight measurements were compared across seven water stress levels created by a line source sprinkler irrigation system. The methods were compared for accuracy, sensitivity, sampling time, and the destructive-disruptive nature of the sampling procedure. Accuracy was estimated by comparison with _leaf and by the interaction between water stress level and time of day. All methods except P_N were significantly correlated with _leaf at the 1% level. However, T_c, T_c — T• and CWSI showed less interaction between water stress level and time of day when total variance was partitioned into its relative components; water stress level, time, and the interaction between water stress level and time of day. All methods, with the exception of P_N, were equally sensitive to the water stress gradient when "goodness of fit" response functions across the water stress gradient were compared. The visual LRS was the most rapid while the canopy temperature-based measurements, T_c, T_c — T•. and CWSI, were nearly three times faster than the gas exchange techniques and about two and a half times faster than _leaf. Leaf water potential sampling was both destructive and disruptive to the crop plant community. The gas exchange methods were nondestructive but repetitive sampling was disruptive. Only the remotely sensed T_c T_c — T_a, CWSI and LRS were neither destructive nor disruptive to the crop. The interpretive value of various measurements is discussed. The CWSI was found to be highly correlated with mean daily PN and represents a significant advancement in crop level detection and measurement of water stress.

Key Words: Rice • Oryza Sativa L. • Leaf water potential • Stomatal resistance • Transpiration rate • Net photosynthesis rate • Canopy temperature • Crop water stress index • Leaf rolling

² Agronomist, visiting scientist, former research assistant, postmasteral fellow, and statistician, Int. Rice Res. Inst. Present address of N.C.T.: CSIRO Dryland Crops and Soils Research Program, Private Bag, P.O., Wembley, WA 6014, Australia.

Received for publication March 12, 1984.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Steiner and J. L. Hatfield Winds of Change: A Century of Agroclimate Research Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(Supplement_3): S-132 - S-152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Baker, D. C. Gitz, P. Payton, D. F. Wanjura, and D. R. Upchurch Using Leaf Gas Exchange to Quantify Drought in Cotton Irrigated Based on Canopy Temperature Measurements Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 637 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Irmak, D. Z. Haman, and R. Bastug Determination of Crop Water Stress Index for Irrigation Timing and Yield Estimation of Corn Agron. J., November 1, 2000; 92(6): 1221 - 1227. [Abstract] [Full Text]