Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 24:1077-1081 (1984)
© 1984 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lees, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lees, G. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lees, G. L.

Cuticle and Cell Wall Thickness: Relation to Mechanical Strength of Whole Leaves and Isolated Cells from Some Forage Legumes1

G. L. Lees2

Leaflets from seven legumes were examined by electron microscopy to determine the thickness of the cuticle, outer tangential epidermal cell wall, and mesophyll cell wall. Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.), and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) have a high resistance to leaf and cell rupture while alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), arrowleaf clover (Trifolium vesiculosum Savi), red clover (T. pratense), and white clover (T. repens L.) are more susceptible. The cuticle and the epidermal cell wall and the mesophyll cell wall were thicker in sainfoin, cicer milkvetch, and birdsfoot trefoil. Correlation coefficients show a strong relationship between a thick cuticle, epidermal, or mesophyll cell wall and a greater resistance to certain types of mechanical damage in whole leaflets or isolated cells. Among the species, cuticle thickness measurements provided a larger coefficient of variation than thickness measurements for epidermal cell wall plus cuticle or cell wall alone. Those legumes which had thicker cuticles and cell walls are considered bloat-safe. Epidermal cell wall and cuticle and mesophyll cell wall thickness are probably leaf morphological characters which contribute to the non-bloating nature of some forage legumes.

Key Words: Mechanical strength • Cell wall • Cuticle • Medicago sativa L. • Trifolium repens L. • T. Pratens L. • T. vesiculosum Savi • Lotus corniculatus L. • Astragalus cicer L. • Onobrychis viciifolia Scop


1 Contribution no. 852 of Agriculture Canada Research Station, 107 Science Cres., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. S7N 0X2.

2 Research scientist, Agriculture Canada Research Station Saskatoon, 107 Science Creg., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. S7N 0X2.

Received for publication June 16, 1983.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the Crop Science Society of America.