Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 24:479-482 (1984)
© 1984 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by McMichael, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by McMichael, B. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by McMichael, B. L.

Genetic Relationship between Turgor Maintenance and Growth in Cotton Germplasm1

J. E. Quisenberry, G. B. Cartwright and B. L. McMichael2

Seventeen photoperiodic sensitive cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) stocks were grown for 2 years (1980 and 1981) at Big Spring, Tex. to evaluate the relationship between turgor maintenance and shoot dry matter accumulation (growth). During each year, leaf-cutter thermocouple psychrometers were used to measure predawn and midday leaf water and osmotic potentials and to estimate turgor pressure at 50 and 80 days after planting (DAP). Shoot dry weights were measured also at 50 and 80 DAP. The 1st year was hot and dry while the 2nd year had about average temperatures and rainfall. Linear regressions between predawn and midday water and turgor potentials were used to estimate turgor maintenance as i) the change in turgor pressure per unit change of water potential (slope) and, ii) the osmotic potential where zero turgor pressure occurred (X intercept). Significant differences did not occur among the stocks for changes in turgor pressure per unit change in water potential (slope), but they did occur among stocks for osmotic potential at zero turgor ({pi}o) all four sampling dates. Analysis over-all of the sampling dates, identified a consistently low (T178) and high (T292) stock for {pi}o. Linear correlation and regression coefficients between shoot dry weights and {pi}o were negative and statistically significant during the sampling period (80 DAP, 1980) when the plants were water-stressed. The linear correlation and regression coefficients were negative, but not statistically significant during the other sampling periods (50 DAP, 1980, and 50 and 80 DAP, 1981). Linear correlation coefficients between the change in shoot dry weights between 50 and 80 DAP in 1980 and the change in {pi}o were negative (r = -0.82) and statistically significant. These relationships suggesthat if selection pressure is directed towards enhancing osmotic adjustment under water stress, a reduced growth potential may result.

Key Words: Osmotic potential • Water potential • Shoot dry weights • Gossypium hirsutum L. • Osmotic adjustment • Physiological genetics


1 Cooperative investigation among the USDA-ARS, the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., and Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79401.

2 Research geneticist, biological laboratory technician, and plant physiologist, respectively. Plant Stress and Water Conservation Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Route 3, Lubbock, TX 79401.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. J. Burke
Evaluation of Source Leaf Responses to Water-Deficit Stresses in Cotton Using a Novel Stress Bioassay
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2007; 143(1): 108 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the Crop Science Society of America.