Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 24:85-87 (1984)
© 1984 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, K. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, K. G.

Comparison of Grain Yield of Uniblends and Biblends of 10 Spring Barley Cultivars1

R. J. Baker and K. G. Briggs2

Pure strands (uniblends) of 10 cultivars of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and the 45 possible 50:50 mixtures (biblends) were evaluated for 3 years in four-replicate randomized blocks. In addition to plot grain yield, data were collected on grain weight, shoot weight, and harvest index from 20 plants (10 in 1977) sampled from each uniblend and from 10 plants of each of the components of each of the biblends. Single plant sampling was carried out in only two replicates in each year. Cultivar identification in the biblend samples was facilitated by evaluation of spike and seed characteristics of each plant. Analyses of whole plot yield and of single plant data indicated that there were no significant differences between average performances in uniblends and biblends. Absence of significant interaction implied that relative cultivar performance in uniblends and biblends was the same. These results suggest that intergenotypic competition among relatively well adapted genotypes should not be of serious consequence in barley breeding programs.

Key Words: Hordeum vulgare L. • 50:50 mixtures • Intergenotypic competition


1 This research was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Grant no. A6029 to the Univ. of Alberta.

2 Senior research scientist, Crop Development Ctr., Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask. S7N 0W0 Canada; professor, Dep. of Plant Science, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. T6G 2HI Canada.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
E.R. Gallandt, S.M. Dofing, P.E. Reisenauer, and E. Donaldson
Diallel Analysis of Cultivar Mixtures in Winter Wheat
Crop Sci., May 1, 2001; 41(3): 792 - 796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S.D. Abernathy, R.H. White, P.F. Colbaugh, M.C. Engelke, G.R. Taylor II, and T.C. Hale
Dollar Spot Resistance among Blends of Creeping Bentgrass Cultivars
Crop Sci., May 1, 2001; 41(3): 806 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the Crop Science Society of America.