Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:1225-1229 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gebeyehou, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gebeyehou, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gebeyehou, G.

Comparative Growth Analysis of Two Spring Wheats and One Spring Barley1

R. J. Baker and Getinet Gebeyehou2

Two cultivars of spring wheat, Triticum aestiuum L., cvs. ‘Neepawa’ and ‘Pitic 62’, and one cultivar of spring barley, Hordeum vulgare L., cv. ‘Bonanza’, were compared for grain yield and its relationship0 to patterns of leaf area development and dry matter accumulation. Each cultivar was planted at an early and a late seeding date at Saskatoon in 1980 and in 1981. Leaf area (cm2/plant) and biological yield (g/m2) were determined at weekly intervals commencing five weeks after seeding. Grain yield, components of grain yield, and final biological yield were measured at maturity. Grain yield was found to be a curvilinear function of final biological yield in Pitic 62 and Bonanza but the relationship appeared to be linear for Neepawa. Within a cultivar, higher biological yield gave higher grain yield.

Bonanza barley produced more dry matter and greater leaf area than either wheat cultivar early in the season. This advantage disappeared as the crop approached maturity. Pitic 62, although having greater maximum leaf area index and greater leaf area duration than Neepawa, tended to have a similar pattern of dry matter accumulation early in the season. Pitic 62 had greater final biological yield and grain yield by virtue of its later maturity. Yield of wheat might be increased without delaying maturity by searching for types which grow quickly under cool spring conditions.

Key Words: Harvest index • Leaf area • Triticum aestivumHordeum vulgare


1 This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. Manuscript

2 Senior research scientist, Crop Development Centre Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon S7N OWO, Canada, and former postdoctorate. fellow (presently research Officer, Inst. for Agric. Res., P.O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia), respectively.

Received for publication December 21, 1981.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P.E. Juskiw, J.H. Helm, and D.F. Salmon
Postheading Biomass Distribution for Monocrops and Mixtures of Small Grain Cereals
Crop Sci., January 1, 2000; 40(1): 148 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.