Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:840-843 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, J.W.
Right arrow Articles by Knott, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, J.W.
Right arrow Articles by Knott, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, J.W.
Right arrow Articles by Knott, D. R.

Evaluation of Honeycomb Selection for Single Plant Yield in Durum Wheat1

J.W. Mitchell, R.J. Baker and D. R. Knott2

Fasoulas' (1973) honeycomb design was used to select for high and low yield among single F2 plants in three crosses of durum wheat, Triticum turgidum L. var. durum, each planted at interplant spacings of 30 and 60 cm. Response to selection, measured by yield of replicated F3 bulks of F4 lines, was significant for all three crosses when grown at 60 cm spacing and for two of the three crosses when grown at 30 cm. Significantly greater response in the downward than in the upward direction was observed in one cross. Correlations between 1979 single plant yields and 1980 plot yields in the one cross where progeny of all plants were tested indicated i) that selection was slightly more effective at wider spacing, ii) that Fasoulas' method was marginally superior to mass selection based on unadjusted single plant yields, and iii) that heritability of single plant yield was 13 to 17%. Average response to single plant selection for yield was 4% of the mean yield in solid seeded plots.

Key Words: Triticum turgidum L. var. durum • Early generation selection


1 Contribution of the Crop Science Dep. and Crop Development Centre, Univ. of Sakatchewan, Saskatoon S7N OWO. Adapted from a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the M.Sc. requirements. Supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

2 Graduate student, Dep. of Crop Science (present address: Plant Science Dep., Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2); senior research scientist, Crop Development Centre; and, professor, Dep. of Crop Science, respectively.

Received for publication September 8, 1981.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. A. Ntanos and D. G. Roupakias
Comparative Efficiency of Two Breeding Methods for Yield and Quality in Rice
Crop Sci., March 1, 2001; 41(2): 345 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M.P. Reynolds, S. Rajaram, and K.D. Sayre
Physiological and Genetic Changes of Irrigated Wheat in the Post-Green Revolution Period and Approaches for Meeting Projected Global Demand
Crop Sci., November 1, 1999; 39(6): 1611 - 1621.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.