Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published in Crop Sci 22:478-485 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by St. Martin, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wiser, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by St. Martin, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wiser, W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by St. Martin, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wiser, W. J.

Selection Indices for the Improvement of Opaque-2 Maize1

S. K. St. Martin, P. J. Loesch, Jr., J. T. Demopulos-Rodriguez and W. J. Wiser2

The need to improve agronomic and protein and kernel quality characters in opaque-2 maize (Zea mays L.) mandates consideration of multiple traits in selection. Data from genetic studies in an opaque-2 maize synthetic were used to calculate selection indices for use in recurrent selection. Grain yield was considered the only trait having explicit economic value. Restricted indices were used to achieve satisfactory gains in kernel hardness, moisture content, and protein content and quality.

The most important traits with respect to achieving the specified selection goals were yield, moisture content, kernel hardness, lysine content, kernel weight, and the degree of light transmission by kernels. Indices incorporating five traits were more efficient in that the addition of a sixth trait contributed very little to expected gains. The most effective combinations of traits for a recurrent selection scheme involving S1 testing were also the most effective for S2 testing and full-sib testing.

The degree to which gains predicted for an index were dependent on accurate estimates of the population parameters was considered. Indices having weights that implied reliance on indirect rather than direct selection response were not recommended.

Substitution of single-plant data for data from replicated progeny tests was considered in connection with each breeding scheme. The possibility of increasing the effective selection intensity, given that resources for replicated testing were fixed, by culling individual plants was investigated, but the use of individual plant data did not increase expected gain.

A measure of subjective judgment on the part of the breeder is probably required for the successful application of selection indices to complex problems.

Key Words: Breeding methods • Protein quality • Recurrent selection • Zea maysL

1 Joint contribution: AR, SEA, USDA, and Journal Paper No. J-10094 of the Iowa Agric. and Home Econ. Exp. Stn., Ames, IA 50011. Project 2194. Part of a dissertation submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. Degree.

2 Formerly graduate research assistant Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA (currently assistant professor, Dept, of Agronomy, Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH. 43210); research geneticist, AR, SEA, USDA, and professor of plant breeding, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011; formerly graduate research assistant, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011; and research agronomist, AR, SEA, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705.

Received for publication March 18, 1981.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.