Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:106-109 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunphy, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dunphy, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, E. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dunphy, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, E. C.

Effect of Forage Utilization on Wheat Grain Yield1

D. J. Dunphy, M. E. McDaniel and E. C. Holt2

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) is used as both a grain and a forage crop throughout Texas. The general practice is to graze wheat during the winter and remove the cattle in the spring to produce a grain crop. Data are needed on the effect of forage utilization on wheat grain production to enable farmers to make management decisions about the alternative uses of the crop.

Field experiments were conducted to determine the effect of forage removal at three stages of plant development on wheat grain yield. Two cultivars were harvested for forage throughout the vegetative stage of growth. The final forage harvest was timed to correspond to the early, mid, or late-joint stage of development. Growing points were not removed in any of the treatments. All treatments, including a check that was not harvested for forage, were harvested for grain yield at maturity.

Delaying the final forage harvest resulted in a significant, progressive reduction in grain yield for both cultivars in each year. Grain yield reductions due to forage utilization ranged from 4 to 84 %. Delaying the final forage harvest generally resulted in reduced tiller survival and fewer seeds per head but had little effect on the average weight per seed.

The data indicate that forage utilization should be terminated by the early joint stage or earlier to obtain maximum grain yields. Removal of livestock on a certain calendar date every year would not be an acceptable practice due to the variation in jointing dates among cultivars and among years.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Yield components • Morphological development


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., College Station, TX 77843.

2 Former research associate, associate professor, and professor, respectively, Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M Univ.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. J. Arzadun, J. I. Arroquy, H. E. Laborde, and R. E. Brevedan
Effect of Planting Date, Clipping Height, and Cultivar on Forage and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat in Argentinean Pampas
Agron. J., September 5, 2006; 98(5): 1274 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. J. Arzadun, J. I. Arroquy, H. E. Laborde, and R. E. Brevedan
Grazing Pressure on Beef and Grain Production of Dual-Purpose Wheat in Argentina
Agron. J., September 1, 2003; 95(5): 1157 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.