Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 21:875-878 (1981)
© 1981 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rood, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Major, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rood, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Major, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rood, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Major, D. J.

Diallel Analysis of the Photoperiodic Response of Maize1

S. B. Rood and D. J. Major2

A diallel cross from eight early maturing maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds was used to investigate the inheritance of photoperiodic response and the role of this response in adaptation to high latitudes. Days from emergence to flowering increased for six of the inbreds and all of the hybrids as the photoperiod was increased from 14 to 22 hours. The photoperiodic response was divided into a basic vegetative phase, which is the time to flowering under ideal photoperiod conditions, and a photoperiodinduced phase. The maximum optimal photoperiod was the longest photoperiod at which no photoperiodinduced delay of flowering-time was observed; the slope of the photoperiod response was the photoperiod sensitivity.

Incomplete dominance for decreased basic vegetative phase (BVP) was observed and an inheritance analysis of BVP produced values for the diallel that were very similar to those obtained previously for flowering-time in field trials. Heritabilities were high for the basic vegetative phase and low for other photoperiod characteristics. Specific combining ability effects were significant for photoperiod sensitivity and maximum optimal photoperiod; reciprocal effects were not significant. General combining ability (GCA) efffects for the basic vegetative phase were correlated with GCA effects for flowering time from field trials in Alberta. For a photoperiod similar to that of 50° N Lat, the average photoperiod-induced delay in floweringtime of the diallel hybrids was 1.5 days. Thus, photoperiod is of only minor importance in the developmental adaptation of the early maturing maize genotypes examined as flowering-time in field trials was closely related to BVP alone.

Key Words: Zea mays L. • Corn • Short-day plant • Flowering • Basic vegetative phase • Photoperiod sensitivity


1 Contribution from Res. Stn., Agric. Can., Lethbridge, Alta., Can. T1J 4B1. Part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in fulfillment of the requirements of the Ph.D, degree at the Univ. of Calgary.

2 Graduate assistant, biology department, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, and crop physiologist, Agriculture Canada Research Station, Lethbridge.

Received for publication September 29, 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the Crop Science Society of America.