Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 21:669-672 (1981)
© 1981 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McBroom, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McBroom, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McBroom, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C. M.

Performance of Isogenic Soybean Lines in Monoculture and Relay Intercropping Environments1

R. L. McBroom, H. H. Hadley and C. M. Brown2

Sets of near-isogenic lines of soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], differing in single characteristics, have been tested in monoculture environments but not in relay intercropping environments. These environments seemed different enough to warrant testing several near isogenic lines differing by the genes dt1, Dt2, Lf1, ln, or e3 to determine if any of these genes confer a yield advantage in relay intercropping.

Near isogenic lines in ‘Harosoy’ and ‘Clark’ genetic backgrokunds were grown in monoculture and in relay intercropping systems at Urbana, 111. in 1978 and 1979 and at DeKalb, 111. in 1979. In relay intercropping plots, soybeans were planted between rows of small grains 1 to 2 months before small grain harvest. The soybeans germinated and established stands, then the small grains were harvested as they matured.

There was no consistent yield advantage for any of the plant traits when isogenic lines were grown either in relay intercropping or in monoculture systems. The dt1 allele reduced yield in both cropping systems. The ln and Lf1 alleles reduced yields in some environments. The Dt2 and e3 alleles had consistently neutral effects on yield in both cropping systems.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Winter wheat • Triticum aestivum L. • Spring oats • Avena sativa L. • Interplanting • Interseeding • Multiple cropping


1 Contribution form the Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801.

2 Former graduate assistant (present address Northrup King Co., St. Joseph, IL 61873), and professors, Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801.

Received for publication August 27, 1980.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
L. Kilgore-Norquest and C.H. Sneller
Effect of Stem Termination on Soybean Traits in Southern U.S. Production Systems
Crop Sci., January 1, 2000; 40(1): 83 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the Crop Science Society of America.