Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 21:644-651 (1981)
© 1981 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moreno-Gonzalez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moreno-Gonzalez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, J. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Moreno-Gonzalez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, J. W.

Epistasis in Related and Unrelated Maize Hybrids Determined by Three Methods

J. Moreno-Gonzalez and J. W. Dudley

The objectives of this study were (1) to estimate genetic parameters in maize (Zea mays L.), (2) develop and apply a genetic model capable of measuring variance associated with additive, dominance, and two factor epistatic effects in a diallel cross including segregating generations, (3) to measure epistasis as difference of three-way crosses from the nonparental single crosses, and (4) to compare different methods measuring the importance of epistasis. Three inbreds derived from Stiff Stalk Synthetic and three inbreds related to the Lancaster variety were used to make all possible crosses, their segregating, selling and backcross generations.

Heterosis for yield and other traits was larger in crosses involving unrelated lines than in crosses involving related ones. No apparent association of genetic effects estimated from the generation mean analysis with crosses involving related or unrelated lines was found. Dominance effects were the most important genetic effects controlling the performance of all traits. Generation mean analysis was a poor method for measuring additive effects. Significant epistatic effects were found in several crosses. Dominance x dominance effects were consistently negative for all traits except yield, suggesting that selection for yield prior to release of the inbreds might have reduced the diminishing effect of this type of epistasis in cross combinations. Dominance effects for yield were larger than the mean of the pooled additive effects of the lines, suggesting that homozygous beneficial genes (with + effects) and homozygous deleterious (with - effects) were present in lines.

In the diallel analysis, the mean squares for dominance effects were larger than for additive effects for yield and plant leaf area, but smaller for plant height, ear height, ear length, and ear diameter. Epistatic variation was significant but small compared to additive and dominance variation. Interactions of genetic effects with locations were significant. When tested against the appropriate interaction mean squares only the dominance mean squares were significant for grain yield. Epistasis was significant in 13 of 54 three-way crosses. The sign of epistasis was predominately positive for yield, suggesting that lines selected for yield may have certain combinations of genes that are expressed favorably in hybrids. Mean epistatic effects over all crosses were significant for yield, ear height, ear length, and ear diameter.

Key Words: Generation mean analysis • Diallel cross • Heterosis • Zea mays L.


1 Contribution from Agronomy Dep., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana and INIA, Spain. Based on a Ph.D. Thesis by the senior author. Supported by funds from the Illinois Agric. Exp. Stn.

Received for publication September 26, 1980.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. A. Malvar, P. Revilla, J. Moreno-Gonzalez, A. Butron, J. Sotelo, and A. Ordas
White Maize: Genetics of Quality and Agronomic Performance
Crop Sci., July 1, 2008; 48(4): 1373 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. R. Hallauer
History, Contribution, and Future of Quantitative Genetics in Plant Breeding: Lessons From Maize
Crop Sci., December 18, 2007; 47(Supplement_3): S-4 - S-19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. C. Perez, H. Ceballos, G. Jaramillo, N. Morante, F. Calle, B. Arias, and A. C. Bellotti
Epistasis in Cassava Adapted to Midaltitude Valley Environments
Crop Sci., June 24, 2005; 45(4): 1491 - 1496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S. Trifunovic, I. Husic, M. Rosulj, and R. Stojsin
Evaluation of U.S. and Yugoslavian Maize Populations as Sources of Favorable Alleles
Crop Sci., March 1, 2001; 41(2): 302 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the Crop Science Society of America.