Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published in Crop Sci 21:495-499 (1981)
© 1981 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Blum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, J.

The Manifestation of Dehydration Avoidance in Wheat Breeding Germplasm1

A. Blum, G. Gozlan and J. Mayer

The genetic improvement of wheat for conditions of drought stress requires an evaluation of specific physiological attributes related to drought resistance, as a basis for developing a working screening procedure. An important component of drought resistance is dehydration avoidance.

Dehydration avoidance is defined as plant ability to maintain a relatively higher leaf water potential under conditions of soil moisture stress.

The purpose of this investigation was to document the existance of and variability in dehydration avoidance within a random sample of advanced and well-adapted wheat (Triticum sp.) genotypes.

Midday leaf water potentials ({Psi}), as a measure of dehydration avoidance, were monitored with a pressure chamber in the various wheat genotypes, simultaneously subjected to soil moisture stress in three different field tests. Leaf diffusive resistance (R1) was monitored with a diffusion porometer in two of the tests.

Genotypes varied significantly in their midday leaf water potentials. About 2 bars of {Psi} were sufficient to differentiate significantly between genotypes. Variations in {Psi} were greater than variations in R1 among genotypes. The largest difference in {Psi} between extreme genotypes, as observed in these tests, reached 12.9 bars.

In one test, where drought stress developed during the spike development stage, leaf water potential (but not leaf diffusive resistance) was correlated with the final number of grains per spike across genotypes of similar phenology.

Linear regressions developed for each genotype between {Psi} and R1 revealed large variations among genotypes in stomatal response to {Psi}. These relationships lead to the conclusion that dehydration avoidance in only a few of the genotypes may have resulted from stomatal sensitivity and closure at low stress levels. Most of the avoidant genotypes, however, maintained relatively open stomata.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Drought resistance • Water stress • Leaf water potential • Stomata • Leaf diffusive resistance

1 Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan, Israel, No. 177-E, 1980 series. This work was supported by a US-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) grant no. 1654/78.

Received for publication June 30, 1980.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the Crop Science Society of America.