Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 16:773-774 (1976)
© 1976 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hockett, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hockett, E. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hockett, E. A.

Gene Effects for Resistance to Kernel Shattering in a Barley Cross1

S. R. Chapman and E. A. Hockett2

Yield losses from shattering have necessitated the development of shatter resistant cultivars, and breeding procedures depend on the type of gene action conditioning the trait under study. Shatter resistance was measured in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as the force required to free a spikelet from the rachis. Measurements were made on single random plants of four generations representing six populations (parents, F1, F2, and single backcrosses) from a cross between two parental lines. All populations were grown near Bozeman, Mont. in both 1968 and 1969. In both years, dominance for shattering susceptibility as well as additive gene effects separating the parents ,were detected. In 1969, a significant additive x additive epistatic effect was detected, and the dominance effect was more than twice as large as it was in 1968. These results suggest that the inheritance of shattering resistance is complex and the expression of gene effects appears to be sensitive to environmental (year) conditions. However, because shatter resistance is recessive and because only the additive x additive epistatic component was significant, in this cross direct selection for shattering resistance in early generations should be effective. More crosses must be evaluated before a general breeding scheme can be proposed.

Key Words: Epistasis • Gene action • Generation mean analysis • Genetic variation • Hordeum vulgare L.


1 Cooperative investigation of the Montana Agric. Exp. Stn. and the ARS, USDA. Published with the approval of the Director of the Montana Agric. Exp. Stn. as Journal Series No. 613.

2 Respectively, professor of agronomy and genetics, Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., and agronomist, ARS, USDA, Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59715.

Received for publication September 13, 1975.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
G. Zhang and M. Mergoum
Developing Evaluation Methods for Kernel Shattering in Spring Wheat
Crop Sci., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 1841 - 1850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Crop Science Society of America.